Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, getting an 87.1 score against 82.9. LG Velvet's construction is just a little lighter and just a little thinner than Google Pixel 4 XL, even when they were released with only 7 months difference. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better processing power than LG Velvet. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The LG Velvet shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with way more MP.
The LG Velvet counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG Velvet is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.