Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is a bit better than the LG Velvet's 87.1 general score. Google Pixel 5 is a lighter device than the LG Velvet, but both are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel count per screen inch. LG Velvet shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a much larger sensor.
LG Velvet features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5% greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Velvet. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, else you can save some money and get the LG Velvet, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.