Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than Google Pixel 6a's general score of 76.4. Despite of the fact LG Velvet is a lot older and a little bit heavier than the Google Pixel 6a, it's body is still somewhat thinner. The LG Velvet features a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a very superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the LG Velvet also has a higher number of faster cores. The LG Velvet shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a way more megapixels back camera.
The LG Velvet has a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 6a counts with a bit superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.