Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is just a bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a score of 87.1 against 82.2. The LG Velvet has a brighter display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a better pixels count in each inch in the screen.
LG Velvet has an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with greater battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.