Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than HTC U Ultra, getting a score of 87.1 against 77. LG Velvet is a a bit heavier phone than HTC U Ultra, but they are 0.31inches thick. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
LG Velvet has a better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 64 GB more internal memory. LG Velvet has a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
LG Velvet features a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The LG Velvet has a superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a much better resolution back facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
LG Velvet not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.