Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2014-05-27 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than LG G3, with an 87.1 score against 76.4. The LG Velvet is a a lot newer and somewhat thinner phone than LG G3, although it is also somewhat heavier. The LG G3 counts with a bit better performance than LG Velvet, because although it has 4 less cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
LG G3 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixels density. The LG Velvet captures much clearer videos and photos than LG G3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor.
LG Velvet has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than LG G3, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. LG Velvet has a way better battery life than LG G3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG Velvet is a lot more expensive than LG G3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.