Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. LG Velvet's construction has the same thickness than LG G7 Fit, but it's somewhat heavier. LG G7 Fit has a sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG Velvet has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 96 GB more internal storage. LG Velvet has a bit better CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a way better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The LG Velvet has a much better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.