Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's general score of 81. LG Velvet's design has the same thickness than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it is heavier. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixels density.
LG G7 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG Velvet takes much better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images in low light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much larger sensor taking much better quality photos.
The LG Velvet has a better storage to install games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. LG Velvet counts with a much better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Although LG Velvet is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G7 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G7 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.