Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 global score. LG Velvet is a just a little thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than the LG G8X ThinQ, although both of them were released only 7 months apart. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better processor than LG Velvet. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. LG G8X ThinQ and LG Velvet count with similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, they have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
LG Velvet features a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
LG Velvet counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG Velvet is more expensive than the LG G8X ThinQ, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.