Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the LG K52, getting an 87.1 score against 76. Even though LG Velvet and the LG K52 were only released 6 months apart, LG Velvet is a bit thinner and a bit lighter. The LG Velvet features a little better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet has a better looking screen than LG K52, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The LG Velvet features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage.
The LG Velvet has a superior camera than LG K52, and although they both have a same size aperture, a 0.5 inches camera sensor and a back camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the LG Velvet also has a much better 3840x2160 video quality. LG Velvet counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than LG K52, because it has an 8% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.