Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a little bit better than LG K92, having a global score of 87.1 against 85.4. Even though LG Velvet and LG K92 were released only a couple months apart, LG Velvet is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. LG Velvet features a bit better processing power than LG K92. They have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG Velvet features a little sharper display than LG K92, because it has a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a bit bigger screen. LG K92 features a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate, the same camera sensor size and the same video resolution, the LG K92 also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The LG K92 counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as the LG Velvet, both have the same 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features just a bit better battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.