Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than LG Q70, having an 87.1 score against 77.9. Even though the LG Velvet and the LG Q70 were released with only 0 months difference, the LG Velvet is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The LG Velvet features a little more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
LG Velvet counts with a bit better processor than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG Velvet counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than LG Q70, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has more internal storage.
LG Velvet counts with a bit better camera than LG Q70, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The LG Velvet counts with just a little better battery life than LG Q70, because it has an 8% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG Velvet is also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.