Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than LG V10's global score of 78.6. LG Velvet is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the LG V10. The LG V10 counts with a more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better screen density.
The LG Velvet features a greater processing power than LG V10, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The LG Velvet counts with a slightly better camera than LG V10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The LG Velvet features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than LG V10, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has more internal storage. LG Velvet features a much longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG Velvet not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the LG V10.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.