Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, with an 87.1 score against 82.5. LG Velvet is a a lot newer phone than LG V30S ThinQ, although it is heavier and a little thicker. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG Velvet. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG Velvet takes much better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
LG V30S ThinQ's storage for apps and games is just as good as LG Velvet's one, they have the same internal memory and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has improved battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 30% more battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.