Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having an 87.1 score against 81.2. The LG Velvet is a newer cellphone than the LG V40 ThinQ, although it's just a bit heavier and a little thicker. LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Velvet. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The LG Velvet has a bigger storage for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG Velvet has longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The LG Velvet takes better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light environments and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
The LG Velvet costs more money than the LG V40 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.