Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is slightly better than the LG Velvet's overall score of 87.1. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, we must note that it is also heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet and the LG V60 ThinQ count with extremely similar screens, both of them have a same size display, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a greater amount of pixels per inch of display. LG Velvet and LG V60 ThinQ count with very similar memory for games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet counts with a better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera, a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality pictures and a way lower video definition, they both have a same size aperture. LG V60 ThinQ features greater battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more money than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Velvet. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG Velvet, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.