Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is slightly better than the LG Velvet's 87.1 global score. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, the LG Wing is a noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker phone than the LG Velvet. LG Wing features a screen that is just as good as the LG Velvet one, both of them have a higher pixels quantity per display inch, an equal 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a same size display.
The LG Wing has a little faster CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG Wing counts with a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG Wing also has a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a lot better resolution camera.
LG Wing features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG Velvet, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG Velvet features a little longer battery performance than LG Wing, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Velvet. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG Velvet, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.