Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge (2022)'s overall score of 84.7. LG Velvet's body is just a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge (2022), but it's a little bit heavier and was released many years before. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG Velvet. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge (2022) and LG Velvet both have really similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display. The LG Velvet features a very superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a higher resolution. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with improved battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.