Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the Motorola Edge (2024), with an 87.1 score against 78.5. LG Velvet is a older and a bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge (2024), but LG managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway. The LG Velvet features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge (2024) features a better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. LG Velvet shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP resolution, a lower video resolution and a lot tinier sensor taking lot worse quality photographs and videos, they both have a same size aperture.
The LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.