Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's general score of 78.5. LG Velvet is an extremely older, a bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
LG Velvet has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Velvet also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a much better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way better video quality, a camera in the back with more mega-pixels and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.