Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's general score of 83.4. LG Velvet's body is a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit worse display pixels density.
LG Velvet features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger sensor and a back camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
LG Velvet has much more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.