Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus, having a score of 87.1 against 82.6. The LG Velvet is a somewhat thinner and lighter device than the Moto G 5G Plus, although both were only released 2 months apart. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus and LG Velvet count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels per display inch and a quite better 1080 x 2520px resolution.
LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The LG Velvet features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G 5G Plus has superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Moto G 5G Plus shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution camera, the same video frame rate, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same video definition, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.