Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-06-14 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Cosmic Emerald |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s overall score of 82.1. The LG Velvet is an older device than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The LG Velvet counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG Velvet counts with a slightly better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG Velvet also has a bit higher pixels number per inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG Velvet counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet takes better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with greater battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.