Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G60s's 79.9 overall score. LG Velvet's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Moto G60s. LG Velvet features a slightly better screen than Moto G60s. Both of them have exactly the same 1080 x 2460 resolution, the same screen density and a screen of the same size.
The LG Velvet has just a little better processing power than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG Velvet has a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G60s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto G60s features better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh. The LG Velvet shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a tinier aperture, a lower (4K) video quality and a lot less mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.