Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, with an 87.1 score against 78.6. Even though the LG Velvet and the Motorola Moto G9 Power were released only 7 months apart, the LG Velvet is somewhat thinner and lighter. The LG Velvet counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
LG Velvet features a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG Velvet also has a lot better screen pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. The LG Velvet has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto G9 Power features a way better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh. The LG Velvet features a bit better camera than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 48 MP resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.