Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-15 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. LG Velvet is a much newer phone than Moto Z Force, but it is just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
LG Velvet counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cores and 2 GB more RAM. LG Velvet has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 64 GB more internal storage.
LG Velvet counts with greater battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 23% larger battery size. The LG Velvet shoots much better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
LG Velvet costs a little more money than Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.