Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. Although the LG Velvet is extremely newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's extremely heavier and extremely thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a CPU that is very similar to the CPU in LG Velvet, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a slightly better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater screen density. LG Velvet counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has more internal memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. The LG Velvet takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a bigger camera aperture, a much bigger sensor and a way more MP back camera.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.