Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. The LG Velvet design is extremely newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, although it's heavier and notably thicker. The LG Velvet counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG Velvet takes much better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
LG Velvet features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 64 GB more internal memory. The LG Velvet has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG Velvet costs more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.