Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Motorola Moto Z3, having an 87.1 score against 77.6. LG Velvet's body is newer than Motorola Moto Z3's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Moto Z3 counts with a processor that is just as good as the LG Velvet one, and although the Moto Z3 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The LG Velvet and the Motorola Moto Z3 have incredibly similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density. The LG Velvet takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
LG Velvet counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has more internal storage capacity. The LG Velvet features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG Velvet is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.