Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Moto Z3 Play, with a global score of 87.1 against 76.3. Although the LG Velvet is newer than Moto Z3 Play, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. LG Velvet features a bit more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little worse pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit larger display.
The LG Velvet has a bit better processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG Velvet has a better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
The LG Velvet features a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG Velvet features a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.