Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Motorola One 5G's 84.6 general score. The LG Velvet design is lighter and thinner than the Motorola One 5G, even when both of them were released only a couple months apart. The LG Velvet and the Motorola One 5G have similar displays, because although the Motorola One 5G has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
LG Velvet features more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola One 5G features better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size. Motorola One 5G has just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.