Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Motorola One Action, having an 87.1 score against 78.5. The LG Velvet body is newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola One Action's, although it is a little bit heavier. The Motorola One Action features just a bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels.
LG Velvet has a little better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG Velvet shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
LG Velvet counts with more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola One Action, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has improved battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG Velvet is also cheaper, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.