Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a overall score of 87.1 against 79.8. The LG Velvet is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Motorola One Hyper, although both were released with only a couple of months difference. The LG Velvet features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bigger screen. LG Velvet and Motorola One Hyper have quite similar cameras, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
LG Velvet has more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG Velvet is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.