Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's score of 80.7. LG Velvet's construction has the same weight than the Motorola One Vision, but it's just a little thinner. The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
The Motorola One Vision has a little bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels in each display inch and a little higher 1080 x 2520px resolution. Motorola One Vision features a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates, a 0.5 inches camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
LG Velvet has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features greater battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.