Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, with an 87.1 score against 80. The LG Velvet body is thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola One Zoom, even when they were released only 8 months apart. LG Velvet counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The LG Velvet has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features a little faster processor than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same resolution back-facing camera and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.