Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Motorola razr (2020)'s score of 87. LG Velvet's design has the same thickness than the Motorola razr (2020), but it is a bit lighter. LG Velvet counts with a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger display, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
LG Velvet counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet features a way better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates, the same sensor size and a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.