Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 395 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s global score of 79.2. The LG Velvet counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bit more memory to store more games and applications than LG Velvet, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The LG Velvet has a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a little better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 9% more battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots just a bit better photos and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a higher resolution camera and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.