Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2023-03-29 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Carbon Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the Motorola ThinkPhone, having a score of 87.1 against 78.9. The LG Velvet design is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola ThinkPhone, even though it was released many years before. Motorola ThinkPhone counts with a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each inch of screen.
LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola ThinkPhone, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a very superior CPU than Motorola ThinkPhone, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores.
The LG Velvet takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola ThinkPhone, although it has a worse 48 MP resolution back camera and a lot smaller sensor taking way worse quality videos and photos, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Motorola ThinkPhone features improved battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.