Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 overall score. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's just a little heavier. Nokia 9 PureView has a little sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG Velvet has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little bit better processing power than LG Velvet. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM.
LG Velvet captures much better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG Velvet counts with better battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.