Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2, having a general score of 87.1 against 79.7. LG Velvet is a just a little lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X2, but both of them have the same thickness. The OPPO Find X2 has a better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X2 counts with a little faster processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet has a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, a 48 megapixels camera and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.