Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a global score of 87.1 against 83.1. The LG Velvet is a thinner and lighter phone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when both were only released with a few months difference. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a slightly better memory for games and applications than LG Velvet, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit superior CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the LG Velvet one, although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a 1 percent smaller battery size. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.