Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than Galaxy A13 5G, with an 87.1 score against 82.1. The LG Velvet is an older cellphone than Galaxy A13 5G, but LG managed to build it a little bit lighter and thinner anyway. The LG Velvet counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a much higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
LG Velvet has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG Velvet features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G counts with improved battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh. The LG Velvet takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.