Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than Galaxy A21, having a global score of 87.1 against 76.1. The LG Velvet body is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy A21, although both were only released 2 months apart. LG Velvet has a little faster processor than Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet has a much better display than Galaxy A21, because it has a little larger display, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and more pixels per inch in the display. LG Velvet has a way better camera than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the LG Velvet also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a much higher video definition and a back facing camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A21, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The LG Velvet is more expensive than Galaxy A21, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.