Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the Galaxy A22, getting a score of 87.1 against 76.1. Although the LG Velvet is older than Galaxy A22, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. LG Velvet has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The LG Velvet features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM. LG Velvet counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A22, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet features a much better camera than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same camera aperture and a 48 megapixels resolution back camera, the LG Velvet also has a way better 3840x2160 video quality. The LG Velvet has a superior battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.