Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, with an 87.1 score against 84.6. Even though LG Velvet is older than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. LG Velvet has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A22 5G features a screen that is very similar to LG Velvet's screen, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. LG Velvet has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A22 5G features longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The LG Velvet has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same resolution camera in the back, the LG Velvet also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.