Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. LG Velvet's body is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released many years before. The LG Velvet has an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. They have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. The LG Velvet has a greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a less mega pixels back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy A25 5G has longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.