Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A31's overall score of 81.3. LG Velvet is a a little bit lighter and a bit thinner phone than Galaxy A31, even when both of them were released with only 1 months difference. The LG Velvet features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A31 and LG Velvet have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy A31 has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. LG Velvet has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet has a bit better camera than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same resolution back camera, the LG Velvet also has a larger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments and a much higher video resolution. The Galaxy A31 counts with superior battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.