Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32 LTE Only's general score of 82. The LG Velvet has just a little better performance than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater display density.
LG Velvet features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution. LG Velvet has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.