Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, with a global score of 87.1 against 77.8. The LG Velvet construction is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, although it was released many years before. LG Velvet has a lot better performance than Galaxy A33 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. The LG Velvet features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A33 5G. Both have the same camera aperture and a same resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G features better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.