Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A34, getting an 87.1 score against 82.9. The Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better processing power than LG Velvet, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. LG Velvet and Galaxy A34 count with similar displays, because although the Galaxy A34 has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels amount in each display inch.
The LG Velvet captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A34. Both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, a F1.8 camera aperture and a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution. The LG Velvet has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A34 has longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.